United States of America v. Approximately $10,000.00 in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
Approximately $10,000.00 in U.S. Currency |
2:2018mc00143 |
September 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/24/18 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to December 20, 2018. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Filing a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture by United States of America. (Khasigian, Kevin) |
Filing 3 AMENDED #1 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Filing a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture by United States of America. (Khasigian, Kevin) Modified on 10/3/2018 (York, M). |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The parties' Stipulation, ECF No. #1 , appears to contain a typographical error. The stipulation refers to and is signed by the "potential claimant Tiffany Brox" but also identifies "Therese Valemore" as the only claimant. If both Brox and Valemore are potential claimants, the parties may file an updated stipulation signed by all parties, or an extension request supported by good cause. See 18 U.S.C. 983. Alternatively, the parties may submit an updated application correcting any typographical error. The court will refrain from acting on the stipulation in the meantime. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED: STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Filing a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture. (York, M) |
Filing 1 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Filing a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture by United States of America. Attorney Khasigian, Kevin Christopher added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Khasigian, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $10,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Approximately $10,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Kevin Christopher Khasigian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.