Hernandez v. Off Duty Officers, Inc. et al
| Ramon Hernandez |
| Off Duty Officers, Inc. and Best Buy, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00252 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER by Best Buy, Inc., Off Duty Officers, Inc. Attorney Poole, Ross M. added. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Poole, Ross) Modified on 3/4/2019 (Huang, H). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Off Duty Officers, Inc. served on 2/14/2019, answer due 3/7/2019. (Hicks, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Best Buy, Inc. served on 2/11/2019, answer due 3/4/2019. (Hicks, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (York, M) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Best Buy, Inc., Off Duty Officers, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Richard Anderson Hoyer* *Hoyer & Hicks* *4 Embarcadero Center, 14th Floor* *San Francisco, CA 94111*. (York, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Ramon Hernandez. Attorney Hoyer, Richard Anderson added. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0972-8103751) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hoyer, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
