CA Planned Parenthood Education Fund v. U.S. Dept of HHS
| California Planned Parenthood Education Fund |
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services |
| 2:2019cv00340 |
| February 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Attorney Olsen, Edward A. added.(Olsen, Edward) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by California Planned Parenthood Education Fund re #3 Civil New Case Documents for TLN. (Kelley, Mary) Modified on 3/7/2019 (Huang, H). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by California Planned Parenthood Education Fund. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services served on 3/6/2019. (Kelley, Mary) Modified on 3/6/2019 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RE-ISSUED as to *U.S. Department of Health and Human Services* with answer to complaint due within *30* days. Attorney *Mary Kathryn Kelley* *Cooley LLP* *4401 Eastgate Mall* *San Diego, CA 92121*. (York, M) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff California Planned Parenthood Education Fund. (Kelley, Mary) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 [DISREGARD - SEE #5 SUMMONS] SUMMONS ISSUED as to *U.S. Department of Health and Human Services* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Mary Kathryn Kelley* *Cooley LLP* *4401 Eastgate Mall* *San Diego, CA 92121*. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 3/6/2019 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Department of Health and Human Services by California Planned Parenthood Education Fund. Attorney Kelley, Mary Kathryn added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8129103) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit (A) Freedom of Information Act Request - August 1, 2018, #3 Exhibit (B) HHS Response - August 1, 2018, #4 Exhibit (C) HHS Response - August 1, 2018, #5 Exhibit (D) HHS Letter - September 24, 2018, #6 Exhibit (E) CPPEF Response - September 28, 2018, #7 Exhibit (F) CPPEF FOIA Status Request - November 2018, #8 Exhibit (G) CPPEF FOIA Status Request - January 2019, #9 Exhibit (H) HHSs FOIA's Website)(Kelley, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CA Planned Parenthood Education Fund v. U.S. Dept of HHS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Olsen, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: California Planned Parenthood Education Fund | |
| Represented By: | Mary Kathryn Kelley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
