(HC) Miles v. Sullivan
Gennel Edward Miles, Jr |
W.J. Sullivan |
2:2019cv00377 |
March 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dennis M Cota |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Gennel Edward Miles, Jr. (Reader, L) |
Filing 8 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami M. Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/26/2019. Consent or Decline due by 4/29/2019. (cc: Tami M. Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/26/2019 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days from the date of service of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Tami M. Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/26/2019 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Henshaw, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order and #6 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Gennel Edward Miles Jr. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Gennel Edward Miles, Jr (Benson, A.) |
CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Gennel Edward Miles, Jr, CDCR# AP-2550 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 4/8/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Becknal, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Gennel Edward Miles Jr. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Gennel Edward Miles, Jr. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS by Gennel Edward Miles, Jr.(Becknal, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Miles v. Sullivan | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Gennel Edward Miles, Jr | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: W.J. Sullivan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.