(PC) Jones v. Beard et al
| Jasmine Lashay Jones |
| C. Cryer, Jeffrey Beard, Renee Kanan and J. Lewis |
| 2:2019cv00461 |
| March 14, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Service Notice issued re complaint filed *3/14/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 4/18/2019/ (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Service Notice) (Coll, A) |
| Filing 3 [DISREGARD - NAME INCORRECT] PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Service Notice issued re complaint filed *3/14/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 4/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Service Notice) (Coll, A) Modified on 3/14/2019 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by LaShay Jones Jasmine. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by LaShay Jones Jasmine. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coll, A) |
| [DISREGARD - NAME INCORRECT] SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on LaShay Jones Jasmine. (Coll, A) Modified on 3/14/2019 (Coll, A). |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Jasmine Lashay Jones. (Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
