(PS) Selck v. County of Sacramento
Plaintiff: Morrey Selck
Defendant: County of Sacramento and Prime Homes Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv00489
Filed: March 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Referring Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2019 Filing 16 STATEMENT re Federal Question and Related Cases by Plaintiff Morrey Selck. (Coll, A)
June 14, 2019 Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Morrey Selck.(Coll, A)
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/5/2019 VACATING the 9/25/2019 initial scheduling conference, RECOMMENDING that Defendant's #5 Motion to Dismiss be granted, the #1 Complaint be dismissed with prejudice against all defendants for lack of jurisdiction, and the case be closed. Referred to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (York, M)
June 6, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #14 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Morrey Selck. (York, M)
June 5, 2019 Filing 13 MINUTES (Text Only) for proceedings before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire: MOTION HEARING held on 6/5/2019 re #5 Motion to Dismiss filed by County of Sacramento. The plaintiff failed to appear, the court takes the matter under submission and will issue a written order. Plaintiffs Counsel No Appearance present. Defendants Counsel Nicole Misner present. Court Reporter/CD Number: Jonathan Anderson. (Callen, V)
May 29, 2019 MAIL RETURNED as RTS; Attempted not known: unable to forward #12 Order, sent to Morrey Selck. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/17/2019 CONTINUING Hearing on #5 Motion to Dismiss to 6/5/2019, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 26 (AC), before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a Statement of Non-Opposition to the motion, no later than 5/22/2019. Failure to file an opposition or to appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition. (York, M)
May 20, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order served on Morrey Selck. (York, M)
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/14/19. DENYING #10 Motion for Preliminary Injunction without prejudice as procedurally defective. (Benson, A.)
May 14, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction served on Morrey Selck. (Benson, A.)
May 6, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for INJUNCTION re sale of personal property by Morrey Selck. (Zignago, K.)
April 17, 2019 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by County of Sacramento. (Misner, Nicole)
April 17, 2019 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by County of Sacramento. (Misner, Nicole)
April 17, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by County of Sacramento. (Misner, Nicole)
April 17, 2019 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by County of Sacramento. (Misner, Nicole)
April 16, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to DISMISS for LACK of JURISDICTION by County of Sacramento. Attorney Misner, Nicole M. added. Motion Hearing SET for 5/29/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Declaration, #4 Consent Form)(Misner, Nicole) Modified on 4/16/2019 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
March 21, 2019 Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Morrey Selck. (Becknal, R)
March 19, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *County of Sacramento* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Morrey Selck* *c/o Salvation Army* *1200 N. B Street* *Sacramento, California 95811*. (Reader, L)
March 19, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/25/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Reader, L)
March 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County of Sacramento by Morrey Selck. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reader, L)
March 19, 2019 RECEIPT number #CAE200096919 $400.00 Filing Fee fbo Morrey Selck by Morrey Selck on 3/19/2019. (Reader, L)
March 19, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 [HAND DELIVERED] Civil New Case Documents for KJM, #3 Summons served on Morrey Selck. (Reader, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PS) Selck v. County of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Sacramento
Represented By: Nicole M. Misner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prime Homes Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morrey Selck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?