Lickley v. Bay Area Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine et al
| Pati Lickley |
| Teodoro P Nissen and Bay Area Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine |
| 2:2019cv00557 |
| March 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| John A Mendez |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/3/2019 REMANDING CASE to Superior Court, Solano County. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Washington, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Stipulation and Order served on Solano County. (Washington, S) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED ORDER re Stipulation to Remand to State Court re #4 Stipulation by Pati Lickley. (Ilg, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Remand to State Court by Pati Lickley. (Ilg, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Bay Area Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Teodoro P Nissen. (Sullivan, Donald) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Superior Court, Solano County, case number FCS052369 by Teodoro P Nissen, Bay Area Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8187944) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sullivan, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
