Mazik et al v. Kaiser Permanente, Inc. et al
| 2:2019cv00559 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/13/2024 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 78 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. Within 21 days from the date of entry of this order, relator shall file a Second Amended Complaint, or a notice of intent not to file. Parties shall file a joint status report regarding the scheduling of this action within 30 days from the date of entry of this order. (Woodson, A)
|
|
Filing
98
STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/17/2023. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/11/2022 GRANTING 80 Stipulation, the Relator's Opposition due by 8/29/2022. The Kaiser Defendants' replies due by 9/26/2022, and the hearing on the motions will be on 10/18/2022.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
74
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/5/2022 ORDERING the Kaiser Defendants' motions in response to the First Amended Complaint will be filed on or before 7/13/2022. Relator's oppositions will be filed on or before 8/12/2022. The Kaiser Defendants' replies will be filed on or before 9/2/2022. The hearing on the motions will be on 10/18/2022, or as soon thereafter subject to the Court's availability. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
72
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/23/2022 ORDERING that the Kaiser Defendants' motions in response to 48 First Amended Complaint will be filed by 7/6/2022. Relator's responses will be filed by 8/5/2022. The Kaiser Defendants' replies will be filed by 8/26/2022. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
69
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/28/2022 STAYING this action. No response to the pleadings is required until 30 days after the court in the Consolidated Cases rules on all first-to-file motions. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/06/21 re 66 Notice of Election filed by State of California, et al., UNSEALING the 48 Amended Complaint; defendants shall be served by the relator. All other contents of the Court's fi le in this action remain under seal and not be made public or served upon the defendant, except for filings already unsealed by order of the Court. The parties shall serve all pleadings and motions upon the Plaintiff States and the other states� 39; respective false claims acts (excluding Maryland). In accordance with the terms of the Maryland False Health Claims Act, the State of Maryland having declined to intervene in this matter, all claims asserted on behalf of Maryland are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/01/2021 ORDERING The Amended Complaint be unsealed and served upon the defendant by the relator. All other contents of the Court's file in this action remain under seal and not be made public or served upon the defendant, except for filings already unsealed by order of the Court. The parties shall serve all pleadings and motions filed in this action. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/7/2021 GRANTING 57 Request to Seal. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/7/2021ORDERING that the Amended Complaint shall remain under SEAL until8/31/2021, or until further order by this Court. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/2/21 ORDERING that Relator's First Amended Qui Tam Complaint shall be filed under seal. The seal shall remain in place for a period of 60 days from its filing, and shall expire automatically thereafter, unless upon the granting of a motion to extend the seal filed by any party prior to the expiration.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/23/2020 GRANTING 36 Motion for 90-Day Extension of Time; ORDERING Realtor Jeffrey Mazik to serve his complaint on Defendants by 2/24/2021. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/22/2020 GRANTING 25 Relator's Motion for Extension of Time for Service of Process. Relator Jeffrey Mazik's deadline to serve his complaint on the named defendants is EXTENDED 30 days up to and including 11/26/2020. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/10/2020 ORDERING 1 The complaint be UNSEALED and served upon the defendant by the relator. All other contents of the Court's file in this action remain under seal and not be made public or served upon the defendant, except for this Order and The Government's Notice of Election to Decline Intervention, which the relator will serve upon the defendant only after service of the complaint. (Reader, L) Modified on 7/13/2020 (Reader, L).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mazik et al v. Kaiser Permanente, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
