Neasham & Kramer LLP v. Neff et al
| Neasham & Kramer LLP |
| Northern Nevada Care, Inc. and Stephen Neff |
| 2:2019cv00565 |
| March 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Morrison C England |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Northern Nevada Care, Inc. served on 5/7/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Kramer, Patricia) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Stephen Neff served on 5/7/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Kramer, Patricia) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of IMPOSITION of STAY by Stephen Neff. Attorney Sweet, Austin Kent added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Sweet, Austin) Modified on 6/4/2019 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Stephen Neff, Northern Nevada Care, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Patricia Kramer* *Neasham & Kramer LLP* *340 Palladio Parkway, Ste. 535* *Folsom, CA 95630*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Neasham & Kramer LLP (Kramer, Patricia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Neasham & Kramer LLP. Attorney Kramer, Patricia added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8188036) (Kramer, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
