(PC) Warden v. Williams et al
Masa Nathaneil Warden and Masa Nathaniel Warden |
B. Cowon, Redding Police Department, W. Williams, The City of Redding, CA and N. Weaver |
2:2019cv00575 |
April 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Flores, E) |
Filing 5 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Northern; Case Number 4:19-cv-00675. |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Masa Nathaneil Warden. (Flores, E) |
![]() |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 3/18/2019. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019) [Transferred from cand on 4/3/2019.] |
Filing 2 Prison Trust Fund Account Statement by Masa Nathaneil Warden. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019) [Transferred from cand on 4/3/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against B. Cowon, Redding Police Department, The City of Redding, CA, N. Weaver, W. Williams. Filed byMasa Nathaneil Warden. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019) Modified on 2/13/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from cand on 4/3/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.