(PC) Cardenas v. Unknown
Danny J. Cardenas and Danny Cardenas, Jr. |
Unknown |
2:2019cv00691 |
April 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Dennis M Cota |
Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/24/2019 ORDERING Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (Henshaw, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #14 Order served on Danny Cardenas Jr. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 13 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on Director of CDCR pursuant to #12 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K) |
Filing 12 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Danny J. Cardenas signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 5/24/2019. Plaintiff's #8 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with this order. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Danny J. Cardenas. (Yin, K) |
Filing 11 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Danny J. Cardenas. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT by Danny J. Cardenas re #1 Civil Rights Complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 9 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Danny J. Cardenas. (Washington, S) |
Filing 8 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Danny J. Cardenas. (Washington, S) Modified on 5/8/2019 (Plummer, M). |
Filing 7 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Danny J. Cardenas. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 6 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 5 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Northern; Case Number 3:19-cv-02043. |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Danny J. Cardenas. (Lundstrom, T) |
case electronically transmitted to the Eastern District of California. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2019) [Transferred from cand on 4/24/2019.] |
Filing 4 ORDER OF TRANSFER. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 4/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019) [Transferred from cand on 4/24/2019.] |
Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to a United States Magistrate Judge. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2019) [Transferred from cand on 4/24/2019.] |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 5/24/2019. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2019) [Transferred from cand on 4/24/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Under The Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. Section 1983) (no process), (Filing Fee: Ifpp entered on 4/16/2019). Filed by Danny J. Cardenas. (Attachments: #(1) Envelope) (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2019) [Transferred from cand on 4/24/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.