(SS) Lilly v. Commissioner of Social Security
Roberta Lilly |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2019cv00781 |
May 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Allison Claire |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Talbert, Daniel P. added. (Talbert, Daniel) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 8/19/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Reader, L) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Kelsey Brown* *Mackenzie Legal, PLLC* *1003 Whitman Street* *Tacoma, WA 98406*. (Reader, L) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/16/2019 GRANTING #4 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order.(Reader, L) |
Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Roberta Lilly. (Brown, Kelsey) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/3/2019 DENYING without prejudice to its renewal with a clear indication of plaintiff's incarceration status #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. If plaintiff is indeed a prisoner, she must provide all of the information regarding such incarceration requested on the form, and comply with 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(2) in refiling her IFP request. If plaintiff is not a prisoner, she should refile her IFP form so indicating. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to renew the IFP application in proper form, or to pay the filing fee. (York, M) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Roberta Lilly. (Brown, Kelsey) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Roberta Lilly. Attorney Brown, Kelsey Mackenzie added. (Brown, Kelsey) (Attachment #1 Civil Cover Sheet) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (SS) Lilly v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roberta Lilly | |
Represented By: | Kelsey Mackenzie Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Daniel P. Talbert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.