Cortes et al v. Tsverov, et al.,
Sigifredo N. Cortes, Maria Del Carmen Cortes, L. A. C., L. J. C. and Y. N. C. |
Christine Lakin and Ruvim Tsverov |
2:2019cv00816 |
May 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Carolyn K Delaney |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/21/19 GRANTING #4 Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED ORDER re #4 Application by Sigifredo N. Cortes. (Pacheco, Frank) Modified on 5/10/2019 (Benson, A.). |
Filing 4 APPLICATION to APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM by Sigifredo N. Cortes. (Pacheco, Frank) Modified on 5/10/2019 (Benson, A.). |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/12/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Christine Lakin, Ruvim Tsverov* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Frank Michael Pacheco* *343 East Main St., Suite 706* *Stockton, CA 95202*. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by all plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8252077) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pacheco, Frank) Modified on 5/9/2019 (Kastilahn, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.