(HC) Pha v. Fox
Petitioner: Neng Saypao Pha
Respondent: Robert Fox
Case Number: 2:2019cv00893
Filed: May 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Referring Judge: William B Shubb
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2019 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to #9 Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-00893 WBS DB. (Kaminski, H)
June 13, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Neng Saypao Pha. (Kaminski, H)
June 12, 2019 Filing 9 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Neng Saypao Pha. (Kaminski, H)
June 7, 2019 Filing 8 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Petition served on Tami Krenzin pursuant to #6 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition. (Yin, K)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/7/2019. (cc: Tami Krenzin) (Yin, K)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/6/2019 GRANTING petitioner's #4 motion to proceed IFP and DIRECTING respondent to file a response to the petition within 60 days. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General.(cc: Tami Krenzin) (Yin, K)
June 7, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Neng Saypao Pha. (Yin, K)
May 23, 2019 Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Neng Saypao Pha. (Huang, H)
May 21, 2019 Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Neng Saypao Pha, CDC AD-3734 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M)
May 20, 2019 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 6/24/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Washington, S)
May 20, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Neng Saypao Pha. (Washington, S)
May 17, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Robert Fox by Neng Saypao Pha.(Washington, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Pha v. Fox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Neng Saypao Pha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Fox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?