Hovsepyan et al v. Geico General Insurance Company et al
| Razmik Hovsepyan, Shushanik Paskevichyan and Suren Hovsepyan |
| Geico General Insurance Company |
| 2:2019cv00899 |
| May 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Morrison C England |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Plaintiffs. Attorney Pendergast, Sheila Wirkus added. (Pendergast, Sheila) Modified on 6/10/2019 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Huang, H) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE of re #1 Notice of Removal by Geico General Insurance Company. (Badawi, Suzanne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2018-00240906 by Geico General Insurance Company. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8269160) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Declaration, #20 Civil Cover Sheet, #21 Notice of Interested Parties, #22 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Badawi, Suzanne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
