Philpott v. Panera, LLC
| Debora Philpott |
| Panera, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00928 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Morrison C England |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
AMENDED ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 10/8/19 ORDERING that #11 Order is SET ASIDE and this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Amended Dismissal of Class Action Without Prejudice re #10 Stipulation of Dismissal - ATY by Debora Philpott. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yeremian, David) |
|
Filing 11
(SET ASIDE, REFER to #13 Order) ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 9/25/19 ORDERING this action DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 10/9/2019 (Kastilahn, A).
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of DISMISSAL without prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Debora Philpott. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yeremian, David) Modified on 9/27/2019 (Reader, L). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 7/2/19 EXTENDING defendant's time to response to plaintiff's complaint until 7/26/2019. (Kastilahn, A)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Defendant to File a Responsive Pleading by Panera, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Im, Christopher) Modified on 6/25/2019 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to File Responsive Pleading by Panera, LLC. Attorney Whang, Daniel C added. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Whang, Daniel) Modified on 5/31/2019 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 6 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Panera, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal. (Im, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Panera, LLC. (Im, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Courtney Higgins re #1 Notice of Removal. (Im, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Christopher Im re #1 Notice of Removal. (Im, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento Superior Court, case number 34-2019-00254303 by Panera, LLC. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8277331) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Im, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Philpott v. Panera, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debora Philpott | |
| Represented By: | David Harmik Yeremian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Panera, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Im |
| Represented By: | Daniel C Whang |
| Represented By: | Daniel C. Whang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
