(PS) Conerly et al v. Veracity Research Company et al
| Carina Conerly and M. T. |
| Kristy Torain and Veracity Research Company |
| 2:2019cv01021 |
| June 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Kendall J Newman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 OBJECTIONS to #4 findings and recommendations by Plaintiff Carina Conerly. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 4
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/7/19 RECOMMENDING that the action be Dismissed without prejudice and ORDERING that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and recommendations. F&R referred to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Kaminski, H)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and Findings and Recommendations, served on Carina Conerly, M. T.. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to EXPEDITE by Carina Conerly, M. T. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Carina Conerly, M. T. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kristy Torain, Veracity Research Company by Carina Conerly, M. T. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Huang, H) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Huang, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
