(PS) Staffin v. Bosenko et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Dale Staffin
Defendant: Shasta Inter-Agency Narcotics Task Force, Roger Moore, Jim Milestone and Tom Bosenko
Case Number: 2:2019cv01058
Filed: June 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Referring Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Christopher Dale Staffin.(Coll, A)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/9/2019 DISMISSING #1 Complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Huang, H)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/9/2019 GRANTING #2 and #4 Motions to Proceed IFP. (Huang, H)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 and #6 Orders served on Christopher Dale Staffin. (Huang, H)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christopher Dale Staffin. (Coll, A)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/14/2019 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit a complete application for leave to proceed IFP or pay the appropriate filing fee within 30 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on Christopher Dale Staffin. (Henshaw, R)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christopher Dale Staffin. (York, M)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Christopher Dale Staffin. (York, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PS) Staffin v. Bosenko et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Dale Staffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shasta Inter-Agency Narcotics Task Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jim Milestone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Bosenko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?