(HC) Bottenfield v. Robertson
| Michael Dale Bottenfield |
| James Robertson |
| 2:2019cv01105 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by James Robertson. Attorney Means, Brian Roy added. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Means, Brian) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-1105 TLN EFB (HC). (Kastilahn, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Michael Dale Bottenfield. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 8 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Michael Dale Bottenfield. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENTS SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4) (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 6
ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/25/2019. Consent or Decline due by 7/29/2019. (cc: Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/24/2019 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DENYING #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order served on Michael Dale Bottenfield. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 7/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Coll, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Michael Dale Bottenfield. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Michael Dale Bottenfield. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Michael Dale Bottenfield. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against James Robertson by Michael Dale Bottenfield. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4)(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Bottenfield v. Robertson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: James Robertson | |
| Represented By: | Brian Roy Means |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Dale Bottenfield | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
