Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Rosen et al
Aetna Life Insurance Company |
Emily Rosen and Phyllis Frank |
2:2019cv01146 |
June 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Insurance |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CASE CLOSED: pursuant to #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (TEXT ONLY ENTRY)(Benson, A.) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Aetna Life Insurance Company. (Rucker, Cindy) |
Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/24/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Phyllis Frank, Emily Rosen* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Cindy Mekari Rucker* *Maynard Cooper & Gale* *1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 1900* *Los Angeles, CA 90067*. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Aetna Life Insurance Company. (Rucker, Cindy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Aetna Life Insurance Company (Rucker, Cindy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Phyllis Frank, Emily Rosen by Aetna Life Insurance Company. Attorney Rucker, Cindy Mekari added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8324875) (Rucker, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.