Gudino v. Mendoza
Plaintiff: Juana Gudino
Defendant: Mario Mendoza and United States of America
Case Number: 2:2019cv01163
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edmund F Brennan
Referring Judge: Dennis M Cota
2 Judge: John A Mendez
3 Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/24/19 CONSOLIDATING lead case 2:18-cv-00963-JAM-EFB and member case 2:19-cv-01163-JAM-EFB. The member case is CLOSED and all future filings are to be made in the lead case. (Kastilahn, A)
July 25, 2019 CASE CLOSED. (Kastilahn, A)
July 24, 2019 Filing 7 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER to Consolidate by United States of America. (Boesch, Victoria) Modified on 7/24/2019 (Kaminski, H).
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 06/26/19 RELATING this case to case number 2:18-cv-0963 JAM EFB and that this related case be REASSIGNED to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings; any dates currently set in this case are VACATED. District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota are no longer assigned to case. The case number on all future filings shall be: 2:19-cv-1163 JAM EFB (cc: TLN, DMC). (Benson, A.)
June 25, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by United States of America re #1 , #3 and #4 Notices and #2 Civil New Case Documents for TLN. (Boesch, Victoria) Modified on 6/25/2019 (York, M).
June 25, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:18-cv-00963-JAM-EFB by United States of America. (Boesch, Victoria) Modified on 6/25/2019 (York, M).
June 25, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of SUBSTITUTION of United States of America in Place of Defendant Dr. Mario Mendoza by United States of America. Attorney Boesch, Victoria L. added. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Scope of Federal Employment)(Boesch, Victoria)
June 25, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Becknal, R)
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tehama County Superior Court, case number 17CI000146 by Juana Gudino. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boesch, Victoria)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gudino v. Mendoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mario Mendoza
Represented By: Victoria L. Boesch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Victoria L. Boesch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juana Gudino
Represented By: Travis E. Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?