(PC) Morgan v. Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept. et al
| Sammy Davis Morgan |
| Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept., Morgan, Sacramento County Main Jail and Croteau |
| 2:2019cv01179 |
| June 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
REQUEST to amend the civil cover sheet by Sammy Davis Morgan. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 8/21/2019 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 15
SECOND AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Sammy Davis Morgan.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 14
REQUEST for RULES and FORMS by Sammy Davis Morgan. (Benson, A.)(Response sent: "The Eastern District of California Local Rules are available on the court website at www.caed.uscourts.gov.") Modified on 8/19/2019 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for DISCOVERY by Sammy Davis Morgan. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 12
REQUEST for HEARING by Sammy Davis Morgan. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 11
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Sammy Davis Morgan.(Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 10
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. The new case number is: 2:19-CV-1179 KJM DMC. (Reader, L)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: [ 10 ] Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Sammy Davis Morgan. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for discovery by Sammy Davis Morgan. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 8
REQUEST for private investigator by Sammy Davis Morgan. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 7
FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Sacramento County Main Jail, Deputy Morgan #847, Sergeant Croteau #847 by Sammy Davis Morgan.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 6
DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Sammy Davis Morgan. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/28/2019 ORDERING that plaintiff may file a first amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (York, M)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order served on Sammy Davis Morgan. (York, M)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/27/2019 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Sammy Davis Morgan. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Sammy Davis Morgan. Copy of #4 Order and #2 Motion to Proceed IFP served on Sacramento County Mail Jail, Attn: Inmate Trust Accounts651 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 7/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Sammy Davis Morgan. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 6/27/2019 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Morgan, Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept., by Sammy Davis Morgan.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Sammy Davis Morgan. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
