Armstrong v. City of Fairfield et al
| Jessica Armstrong |
| Strickland, City of Fairfield and Pena |
| 2:2019cv01325 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/9/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 KJM Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Fairfield, Pena, Strickland* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Stanley Goff* *Law Office of Stanley Goff* *15 Boardman Place* *San Francisco, CA 94103*. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 3
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/5/19 GRANTING the #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; and ORDERING Plaintiff to effect service as required under Rule 4. (Becknal, R)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jessica Armstrong. (Goff, Stanley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Jessica Armstrong. Attorney Goff, Stanley added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goff, Stanley) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
