Hopson v. Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California
| Cynthia Hopson |
| Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California and Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California Doing business as Pep Boys #711 |
| 2:2019cv01370 |
| July 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California. (Infelise, Robert) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER by Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California. Attorney Infelise, Robert D. added.(Infelise, Robert) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California served on 8/9/2019. (Malakauskas, Daniel) Modified on 8/20/2019 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel Malakauskas* *Malakauskas Law, APC* *7345 S. Durango Dr., Suite B-107-240* *Las Vegas, NV 89113*. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Cynthia Hopson. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8367500) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Malakauskas, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
