(HC) Wells v. People of the State of California et al
Emmanuel Wells |
The People of the State of California, California Attorney General and People of the State of California |
2:2019cv01434 |
July 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dennis M Cota |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to #3 Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-01434-KJM-DMC. (York, M) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Emmanuel Wells. (York, M) |
Filing 3 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Emmanuel Wells. (York, M) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Consent or Decline due by 8/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (York, M) |
Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against California Attorney General, The People of the State of California by Emmanuel Wells. (York, M) |
SERVICE at PUBLIC COUNTER: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Emmanuel Wells. (York, M) |
RECEIPT number #CAE200099843 $5.00 fbo Emmanuel Wells by Emmanuel Wells on 7/26/2019. (York, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.