(PC) Koch v. Rosenfield
| Roland Thomas Koch |
| Kenneth Rosenfield |
| 2:2019cv01474 |
| August 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| John A Mendez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #8 by Plaintiff Roland Thomas Koch. (Kaminski, H) |
| RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider re-served on Roland Thomas Koch at CSH. (Yin, K) |
| MAIL RETURNED as NIC: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider sent to Roland Thomas Koch. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 8
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/21/2019 ORDERING Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed with prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Order and Findings and Recommendations, this case has been assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-1474 JAM DB (PC). (Henshaw, R) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Roland Thomas Koch. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Roland Thomas Koch. (Coll, A) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/6/2019 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP including a certified copy of his jail trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order and IFP application served on Roland Thomas Koch. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S ADDRESS UPDATED to ID# 1188-2, Coalinga State Hospital pursuant to Notice of Change of Address filed in 1:18-cv-01693-DAD-SAB (PC). (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Henshaw, R) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Roland Thomas Koch. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Roland Thomas Koch. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Kenneth Rosenfield by Roland Thomas Koch.(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Koch v. Rosenfield | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kenneth Rosenfield | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roland Thomas Koch | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
