(SS) Dove v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Robert P Dove and Robert P. Dove
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2019cv01475
Filed: August 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Commissioner of Social Security served on 8/21/2019. (Huang, H)
August 26, 2019 Filing 8 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Chen, Carolyn B. added. (Chen, Carolyn)
August 13, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Robert P. Dove. (Lott, Shellie)
August 7, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Robert P. Dove pursuant to order of the court. (Lott, Shellie)
August 6, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Shellie Lott* *Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP* *42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400* *Stockton, CA 95202*. (Becknal, R)
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 11/7/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 SS Consent Form) (Becknal, R)
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/5/19 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the Clerk to issue process. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM all necessary documents to effectuate service on the defendant and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is DIRECTED to serve all process no later than 60 days from the date of this order.(Becknal, R)
August 1, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Robert P Dove. (Lott, Shellie)
August 1, 2019 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Robert P Dove. Attorney Lott, Shellie added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lott, Shellie)
August 1, 2019 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Dove v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert P Dove
Represented By: Shellie Lott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert P. Dove
Represented By: Shellie Lott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Carolyn B. Chen, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?