(PC) Choyce v. Hampton et al
Plaintiff: Benjamin Choyce, Jr.
Defendant: G. Hampton, C. Burnett and R.L. Briggs
Case Number: 2:2019cv01478
Filed: August 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Benjamin Choyce, Jr. (Coll, A) Modified on 9/18/2019 (Plummer, M).
September 9, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to Atascadero DSH Unit 34, PO Box 7001, Atascadero, CA 93423-7001 by Benjamin Choyce, Jr. (Huang, H)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/19/2019 DENYING without prejudice #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Henshaw, R)
August 19, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on Benjamin Choyce Jr. (Henshaw, R)
August 16, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Benjamin Choyce, Jr. (Reader, L)
August 13, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Benjamin Choyce, Jr. (York, M)
August 9, 2019 Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Benjamin Choyce, Jr. (York, M)
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/8/2019 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, an affidavit to proceed ifp or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The Clerk shall send plaintiff an ifp application. (Yin, K)
August 8, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and ifp served on Benjamin Choyce Jr.. (Yin, K)
August 6, 2019 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *8/2/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 9/9/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Kastilahn, A)
August 6, 2019 SERVICE BY EMAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Benjamin Choyce, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
August 2, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Benjamin Choyce, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kastilahn, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Choyce v. Hampton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Burnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.L. Briggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin Choyce, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?