(PS) Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. State of California
Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT |
State of California |
2:2019cv01504 |
August 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Carolyn K Delaney |
Troy L Nunley |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 REFERRAL NOTICE of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Sergei Portnoy: This matter is referred to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 9 USCA CASE NUMBER 19-16844 for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. (York, M) |
Filing 8 APPEAL PROCESSED to Ninth Circuit re #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. Notice of Appeal filed *9/17/2019*, Complaint filed *8/6/2019* and Appealed Order / Judgment filed *9/4/2019*. ** *Fee Status: IFP Granted on 8/8/2019* (Coll, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Appeal Processed to USCA served on Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. (Coll, A) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of APPEAL by Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT as to #5 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations. (Coll, A) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT dated *9/4/2019* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/3/2019. (Huang, H) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/3/2019 ADOPTING #3 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Judgment and #5 Order served on Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. (Huang, H) |
Filing 4 OBJECTIONS to #3 Findings and Recommendations by Plaintiff Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. (Coll, A) |
Filing 3 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/8/2019 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without leave to amend, and the case be closed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's.(Reader, L) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Findings and Recommendations, served on Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. (Reader, L) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. (Coll, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of California by Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coll, A) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (PS) Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. State of California | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State of California | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.