(PS) Iegorova v. Feygan
Liudmyla Iegorova |
Daniil Feygan |
2:2019cv01512 |
August 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Morrison C England |
Kendall J Newman |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Status Conference minutes served on Liudmyla Iegorova. (Waldrop, A) |
Filing 4 MINUTES (Text Only) for proceedings before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman: STATUS CONFERENCE RE: VEXATIOUS LITIGANT held on 10/3/2019. Plaintiff not present. The Court noted the plaintiff's non-appearance. Order to issue. Plaintiff's Counsel Liudmyla Iegorova (Pro Se) not present. Court Reporter: ECRO. (Waldrop, A) |
MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, forward time expired: #3 Order to Show Cause sent to Liudmyla Iegorova at 8913 Fair Oaks Blvd. Apt. E. Notice of Change of Address due by 12/2/2019. (Zignago, K.) |
MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Not Deliverable as Addressed: #3 Order to Show Cause sent to Liudmyla Iegorova. Notice of Change of Address due by 11/12/2019. (Coll, A) |
SERVICE at PUBLIC COUNTER: #3 Order to Show Cause served on Liudmyla Iegorova. (York, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/26/2019 ORDERING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why she should not be declared a vexatious litigant. Plaintiff is NOTIFIED that under a vexatious litigant designation, a prefiling order may be imposed, which may: require security be posted to maintain cases, restrict the filing of new cases via a prefiling order, and limit the number of motions plaintiff may maintain in a single case, including a limitation on her use of the in propria persona motion. Plaintiff may submit a written response to this order on or before 9/12/2019. Plaintiff is further ORDERED TO APPEAR on 10/3/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve this Order on Ms. Iegorova at each of the 3 addresses listed in CM/ECF, and is further DIRECTED to serve her at the public counter when she next appears. (Huang, H) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order to Show Cause served on Liudmyla Iegorova at 6436 Sol Way, Citrus Heights, CA 95621; 2999 Fulton Ave, Sacramento, CA 95821; and 8913 Fair Oaks Blvd. #E, Carmichael, CA 95608. Service Over Counter: Pending. (Huang, H) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Coll, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Liudmyla Iegorova. (Coll, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daniil Feygan by Liudmyla Iegorova. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (PS) Iegorova v. Feygan | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Daniil Feygan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Liudmyla Iegorova | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.