Johnson et al v. USA
| Gail D. Johnson and Richard L. Johnson |
| USA and United States of America |
| 2:2019cv01561 |
| August 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Richard L. Johnson, Gail D. Johnson. (Kelly, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Gail D. Johnson, Richard L. Johnson. (Kelly, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Richard L. Johnson, Gail D. Johnson. (Kelly, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Richard L. Johnson, Gail D. Johnson. All Defendants. (Kelly, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Coll, A) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *USA* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Timothy Edward Kelly* *7801 N Pershing Ave* *Stockton, CA 95207*. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBITS by Gail D. Johnson, Richard L. Johnson. (Kelly, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA by Richard L. Johnson, Gail D. Johnson. Attorney Kelly, Timothy Edward added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8403599) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kelly, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
