Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC v. City of Parlier, California
Plaintiff: Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC
Defendant: City of Parlier, California
Case Number: 2:2019cv01607
Filed: August 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Morrison C England
Referring Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/3/2019. The briefing schedule on the Motion to Dismiss is hereby modified such that Plaintiff's opposition shall be filed on or before October 21, 2019, and Defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed on October 28, 2019.(Deutsch, S)
October 2, 2019 Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: The Court received the STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Modification of Briefing Schedule for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14). Pursuant to Local Rule 137(b), regarding the requirements for proper filing of a proposed order, you are required to email the proposed order (in Microsoft Word) to chambersin addition to filing the pdf version via the CM/ECF system. Pursuant to Local Rules 101 and 131(c), the definition for "signature", you may enter /s/ for signatures for all counsel. Please submit your proposed order today in Microsoft Word format to: mceorders@caed.uscourts.gov. (Deutsch, S)
October 1, 2019 Filing 14 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Modification of Briefing Schedule for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC. (Vu, Bao)
September 16, 2019 Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy G. Michel for District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/16/2019: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the October 17, 2019 hearing on the #10 Motion to Dismiss is VACATED and SUBMITTED without appearance and argument. The opposition or statement of non-opposition and reply due dates shall be filed in accordance with the original motion hearing date. If the Court determines that oral argument is needed it will be scheduled at a later date. Any outstanding request for telephonic appearance is denied as moot. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Michel, G.)
September 12, 2019 Filing 12 AMENDED MEMORANDUM #11 of Points and Authorities by City of Parlier, California in SUPPORT of #10 Motion to Dismiss. (Costanzo, Neal) Modified on 9/12/2019 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
September 12, 2019 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities by City of Parlier, California in SUPPORT of #10 Motion to Dismiss. (Costanzo, Neal) Modified on 9/12/2019 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
September 12, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to DISMISS by City of Parlier, California. Attorney Costanzo, Neal E. added. Motion Hearing SET for 10/17/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. (Costanzo, Neal) Modified on 9/12/2019 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/23/19 DENYING #7 Motion for TRO. Enfinity may file a regularly noticed Motion for Preliminary Injunction should it choose to do so. (Coll, A)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/21/2019 GRANTING #6 Request to Seal Documents. (Zignago, K.)
August 21, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Dylan Sontag, #3 Declaration of Reagan Farr, #4 Declaration of Bao M. Vu, #5 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order, #6 Proposed Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction)(Vu, Bao)
August 20, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Request to Seal Document(s) pursuant to L.R. 141 by Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vu, Bao)
August 20, 2019 Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Becknal, R)
August 20, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Parlier, California* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Bao M. Vu* *Stoel Rives LLP* *Three Embarcadero Center Suite 1120* *San Francisco, CA 94111*. (Becknal, R)
August 19, 2019 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC. (Vu, Bao)
August 19, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC (Vu, Bao)
August 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Parlier, California by Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8414579) (Vu, Bao)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC v. City of Parlier, California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC
Represented By: Seth D. Hilton
Represented By: Bao M. Vu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Parlier, California
Represented By: Neal E. Costanzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?