(HC) Egge v. CDCR et al
William Dean Egge |
Superior Court of California, CDCR and County of Sacramento |
2:2019cv01884 |
September 18, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
John A Mendez |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations and #7 Judgment served on William Dean Egge. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 5 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by William Dean Egge. (Zignago, K.) |
![]() |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Order and Findings and Recommendations, this case has been assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-1884 JAM DB (HC). (Henshaw, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on William Dean Egge. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/24/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Tupolo, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on William Dean Egge. (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of MANDAMUS against CDCR, County of Sacramento, Superior Court of California by William Dean Egge.(Tupolo, A) Modified on 9/20/2019 (Plummer, M). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.