Jenkins v. City of Vallejo et al
| Deyana Jenkins |
| Andrew Bidou and City of Vallejo |
| 2:2019cv01896 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of unavailability of counsel by Andrew Bidou, City of Vallejo. (Smyth, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by Andrew Bidou, City of Vallejo. Attorney Knight, Katelyn added. (Knight, Katelyn) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Defendants on 10/09/19. (Pointer, Adante) Modified on 10/17/2019 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Adante Pointer on behalf of Deyana Jenkins. Attorney Pointer, Adante added. (Pointer, Adante) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Andrew Bidou, City of Vallejo* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Melissa Catherine Nold* *7677 Oakport St.* *Suite 1120* *Oakland, CA 94621*. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Deyana Jenkins. Attorney Nold, Melissa Catherine added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8469087) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nold, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
