Loescher v. County of Plumas et al
Plaintiff: Lynne Loescher
Defendant: County of Plumas, Greg Hagwood and Kelly
Case Number: 2:2019cv01984
Filed: September 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Referring Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
2 Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by County of Plumas, Greg Hagwood. Attorney Hewitt, Shanan L. added. (Hewitt, Shanan)
November 8, 2019 Filing 6 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to County of Plumas on 10/25/2019, Answer due 12/24/2019; Greg Hagwood on 10/25/2019, Answer due 12/24/2019 (Attachments: #1 Re: Plumas County Sheriff Greg Hagwood)(Hewitt, Shanan)
October 23, 2019 Filing 5 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Lynne Loescher. (Baumbach, Larry)
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/2/2019 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign this case to another Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota RECUSED. This action is REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. New Case Number: 2:19-CV-1984 KJM KJN. (Reader, L)
October 1, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/13/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Tupolo, A)
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *County of Plumas, Greg Hagwood, Kelly* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Larry L. Baumbach* *Law Offices of Larry L. Baumbach* *2531 Forest Avenue., Suite 100* *Chico, CA 95928*. (Tupolo, A)
September 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Lynne Loescher. Attorney Baumbach, Larry L. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8492366) (#1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baumbach, Larry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loescher v. County of Plumas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Plumas
Represented By: Shanan L. Hewitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Hagwood
Represented By: Shanan L. Hewitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynne Loescher
Represented By: Larry L. Baumbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?