Jones v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Tonish E. Jones |
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. |
2:2019cv01997 |
October 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
Troy L Nunley |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to District of New Jersey. Electronic Case File Sent. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) |
OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from District of New Jersey case number 3:19-cv-19583. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Tonish E. Jones. (Williams, Michael) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Coll, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael J. Williams* *2500 Main Place Tower* *350 Main Street* *Buffalo, NY 14202-3725*. (Coll, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. by Tonish E. Jones. Attorney Williams, Michael J. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8498407) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Williams, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.