(PS) Estrada v. Martin et al
| Frank Rudolph Estrada |
| Hannah Gray, Matt Martin, Erin Forrester and Sandra Reese |
| 2:2019cv02115 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| John A Mendez |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Frank Rudolph Estrada pursuant to order of the court. (Zignago, K.) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to California Correctional Center, P.O. Box 2400, Susanville, CA 96127 by Frank Rudolph Estrada. (York, M) |
| Filing 9 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/19/2020, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 25 (KJN), before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (York, M) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Erin Forrester, Hannah Gray, Matt Martin, Sandra Reese* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Frank Rudolph Estrada, # BK-0645* *DEUEL VOCATIONAL INSTITUTION* *23500 Kasson Road* *Tracy, CA 95304*. (York, M) |
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/7/2019 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Service of the complaint is appropriate for the named defendants. The clerk is DIRECTED to issue process. Within 30 days from the date of this order is filed, plaintiff shall submit to the USM the necessary documents and within 10 days thereafter, file a statement with the court. Within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiff, the USM is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs. (Copy to: USM.) (York, M)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order, #8 Summons, #9 Civil New Case Documents, 1 Copy of #1 Complaint along with 4 USM-285 forms and Instructions sheet served on Frank Rudolph Estrada. (York, M) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Frank Rudolph Estrada. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Frank Rudolph Estrada. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Frank Rudolph Estrada, CDC BK-0645 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *10/18/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 11/25/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Tupolo, A) |
| SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Frank Rudolph Estrada. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Frank Rudolph Estrada. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Erin Forrester, Hannah Gray, Matt Martin, Sandra Reese by Frank Rudolph Estrada. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tupolo, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
