Back Country Horsemen of America et al v. U.S. Forest Service
Forest Issues Group, Back Country Horsemen of America, Back Country Horsemen of California, The Wilderness Society and Gold Country Trails Council |
U.S. Forest Service |
2:2019cv02149 |
October 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Allison Claire |
John A Mendez |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/17/19 GRANTING #11 Stipulation and Proposed Order, CONTINUING the deadline to respond to the complaint to 2/25/20. (Coll, A) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint by U.S. Forest Service. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Norman, Erika) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Erika Danielle Norman on behalf of U.S. Forest Service. Attorney Norman, Erika Danielle added. (Norman, Erika) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by All Plaintiffs. U.S. Forest Service served on 10/28/2019,. (Ince-Johannsen, Sangye) Modified on 11/6/2019 (York, M). |
Filing 8 DECLINE to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Back Country Horsemen of America, Back Country Horsemen of CA, Forest Issues Group, Gold Country Trails Council, The Wilderness Society. (Ince-Johannsen, Sangye) Modified on 10/29/2019 (Reader, L). |
Filing 7 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/19. ADDED Attorney Susan Jane M. Brown, PHV for Back Country Horsemen of America, Back Country Horsemen of California, Forest Issues Group, Gold Country Trails Council, and The Wilderness Society. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 6 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/19. ADDED Attorney Sangye Ince-Johannsen, PHV for Back Country Horsemen of America, Back Country Horsemen of California, Forest Issues Group, Gold Country Trails Council and The Wilderness Society. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 5 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Back Country Horsemen of America, Back Country Horsemen of California, Forest Issues Group, Gold Country Trails Council, The Wilderness Society for attorney Susan Jane McKibben Brown to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8533917) (Wheeler, Thomas) |
Filing 4 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Back Country Horsemen of America, Back Country Horsemen of California, Forest Issues Group, Gold Country Trails Council, The Wilderness Society for attorney Sangye Ince-Johannsen to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8533888) (Wheeler, Thomas) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *U.S. Forest Service* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Thomas Wheeler* *Environmental Protection Information Center* *1335 William St.* *Eureka, CA 95501*. (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Forest Service by The Wilderness Society, Gold Country Trails Council, Back Country Horsemen of America, Backcountry Horsemen of California, Forest Issues Group. Attorney Wheeler, Thomas added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8532320) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wheeler, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.