(PS) Sheetmetal & Assoc. v. Federal Express Corp.
Sheetmetal & Associates |
Federal Express Corporation |
2:2019cv02154 |
October 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
Troy L Nunley |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE to RESCHEDULE HEARING on #6 Motion to Dismiss : Motion Hearing set for 1/8/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Stroup, Stephanie) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/5/2019: Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #6 ) shall be noticed before the assigned Magistrate Judge. Counsel for Defendant shall contact the Clerk for Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for available law and motion dates, and re-notice the motion before the Magistrate Judge with the proper time and date. Accordingly, the 1/9/2020 hearing before District Judge Troy L. Nunley is VACATED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
Filing 6 MOTION to DISMISS by Federal Express Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 1/9/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(Stroup, Stephanie) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/4/19 DISREGARDING #4 Notice to Withdraw Notice of Removal. (Coll, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order served on Sheetmetal & Associates. (Coll, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Minute Order served on Sheetmetal & Associates. (Krueger, M) |
Filing 4 [DISREGARDED pursuant to #5 Order] NOTICE Ex Parte to Withdraw Notice of Removal by Federal Express Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2, Order, #3 Proposed Order)(Stroup, Stephanie) Modified on 11/5/2019 (Coll, A). |
Filing 3 AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Solano County Superior Court, case number FCS053598 by Federal Express Corp. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8534306) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit B, Declaration of Carol Dickey)(Stroup, Stephanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (PS) Sheetmetal & Assoc. v. Federal Express Corp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sheetmetal & Associates | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation | |
Represented By: | Stephanie Anne Stroup |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.