(PC) Hicks v. Davis et al
Plaintiff: Michael J. Hicks
Defendant: Mark Davis and Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman
Case Number: 2:2019cv02424
Filed: December 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Referring Judge: Morrison C England
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to RJ Donovan Correctional Facility, 480 Alta Road, San Diego, CA 92179 by Michael J. Hicks. (York, M)
December 13, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Michael J. Hicks. (Coll, A) Modified on 12/17/2019 (Plummer, M).
December 13, 2019 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-02424-MCE-CKD. (Tupolo, A)
December 13, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Michael J. Hicks. (Tupolo, A)
December 12, 2019 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Tupolo, A)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/09/19 ORDERING Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Plummer, M)
December 9, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, and prisoner IFP form served on Michael J. Hicks. (Plummer, M)
December 4, 2019 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *12/4/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 1/6/2020 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Tupolo, A)
December 4, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman, Mark Davis by Michael J. Hicks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tupolo, A)
December 4, 2019 SERVICE BY EMAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Michael J. Hicks. (Tupolo, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Hicks v. Davis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael J. Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?