Woodyard, LLC v. Syar Industries Inc
| Woodyard, LLC |
| Syar Industries, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02495 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Morrison C England |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: On the court's own motion, a hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #8 ) is SET for 4/24/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Motion briefing deadlines are reset as provided by Local Rule 230. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
| Filing 12 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/24/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to the 10 Minute Order Reassigning Case, this action is Randomly REASSIGNED to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller for all further proceedings. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. is no longer associated with this case. The case number on all future filed documents shall be: 2:19-cv-2495 KJM DB. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY)(Donati, J) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to the Senior Status of District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., the Clerk's Office is directed to reassign this case to another district judge for all further proceedings. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the 3/19/2020 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss #8 is vacated and submitted without appearance and argument. The opposition or statement of non-opposition and reply due dates shall be filed in accordance with the original motion hearing date. If the Court determines that oral argument is needed it will be scheduled at a later date. Any outstanding request for telephonic appearance is denied as moot. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to DISMISS by Syar Industries, Inc. Motion Hearing set for 3/19/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Hungerford, Sean) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6). The motion as filed is deficient must be renoticed in compliance with Local Rule 230(a). Accordingly, the 3/31/2020 hearing is VACATED. Available civil law and motion calendar dates can be found on the Court's website at www.caed.uscourts.gov by following these menu items: Judges, All Judges, United States District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (MCE), Standard Information (under the Case Management Procedures). Reservation of a hearing date is not required and all civil motions are at 2:00 p.m., in courtroom 7. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to DISMISS by Syar Industries, Inc. Attorney Hungerford, Sean K. added. Motion Hearing set for 3/31/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Statement)(Hungerford, Sean) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Syar Industries, Inc. served on 12/20/2019. (Vinding, Michael) Modified on 1/6/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to the Senior Status of District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., the Clerk's Office is directed to reassign this case to another district judge for all further proceedings. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Syar Industries, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael Vinding* *Brady & Vinding* *520 Capitol Mall, Suite 630* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Syar Industries, Inc. by Woodyard, LLC. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8621160) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vinding, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodyard, LLC v. Syar Industries Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Woodyard, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael Vinding |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Syar Industries, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sean K. Hungerford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
