(PS) Starr v. Ortega Gonzalez et al
Robin Gillen Starr |
Sophia Ortega Gonzalez, Triple A Auto Insurance and Cal State Auto Association |
2:2019cv02576 |
December 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Troy L Nunley |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to file First Amended Complaint by Robin Gillen Starr. (Huang, H) |
Filing 5 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Robin Gillen Starr. (Reader, L) |
Filing 4 OBJECTIONS by Robin Gillen Starr to #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Reader, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/9/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED, but with leave to amend. Within 28 days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint in accordance with this order. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, served on Robin Gillen Starr. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Robin Gillen Starr. (Tupolo, A) Modified on 12/23/2019 (Waldrop, A). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Robin Gillen Starr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tupolo, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.