(PC) Wells v. CDCR Employees et al
| Jesse C. Wells |
| A.W. Zamora, Laura Eldridge, CDCR Employees, M Allen, All Employees of CDCR at CHCF (Stockton), Pereira and Sanchez |
| 2:2019cv02625 |
| December 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Motion to Proceed IFP served on CDCR. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/25/2020 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jesse C. Wells. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/25/2020 GRANTING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP and DISMISSING #1 Complaint with leave to amend within 30 days from the date of service of this order. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. All fees to be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to CDCR filed concurrently herewith. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order and #10 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Jesse C. Wells. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-2625-KJM-CKD. (Tupolo, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Jesse C. Wells. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 6 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 2/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 5 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Northern; Case Number 5:19-cv-07932. |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Jesse C. Wells. (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF TRANSFER. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to the Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2019) [Transferred from cand on 12/30/2019.]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Jesse C. Wells. (Attachments: #1 certificate)(cvS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2019) [Transferred from cand on 12/30/2019.] |
| Filing 2 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jesse C. Wells.. (cvS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2019) [Transferred from cand on 12/30/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Employees of CDCR at CHCF (Stockton), M. Allen, CDCR Employees, Laura Eldridge, Pereira, Sanchez, A.W. Zamora. Filed byJesse C. Wells. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cvS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2019) [Transferred from cand on 12/30/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
