United States of America v. Clemans
| United States of America |
| Michael Carey Clemans |
| 2:2019mc00103 |
| June 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by United States of America re #9 Order Dismissing Case,. (Ernce, Lynn) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/23/2019 ORDERING that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3205(c)(10)(B), the Writ of Continuing Garnishment (Bank, Stocks or Brokerage Accounts) previously issued against Michael Carey Clemans on 6/27/2019 is hereby TERMINATED. The Clerk shall CLOSE this miscellaneous case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
| Filing 8 REQUEST for an Order Terminating Writ of Continuing Garnishment (Bank, Stocks or Brokerage Accounts by United States of America re #3 Writ Issued. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ernce, Lynn) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of service and answer of garnishee re Application for Writ of Garnishment. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE re consent by Michael Carey Clemans. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:19-mc-00102, 2:15-cr-00227 by United States of America. (Ernce, Lynn) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment, #2 Issued Writ, #3 Clerk's Notice to Judgment Debtor, #4 Instructions on How to Claim Exemptions, #5 Instructions Re Objecting to the Answer of Garnishee, #6 Request for Hearing Form, #7 Consent Form, #8 Notice of Availability of a Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction and Appeals Instructions)(Ernce, Lynn) |
| Filing 3 WRIT of continuing garnishment ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Instructions) (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment (Bank, Stocks or Brokerage Accounts) as to Golden 1 Credit Union, #2 Issued Writ, #3 Instructions to Garnishee, #4 Acknowledgment of Service and Answer Form, #5 Consent Form, #6 Notice of Jurisdiction of MJ)(Ernce, Lynn) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for WRIT of GARNISHMENT (Bank, Stocks or Brokerage Accounts) as to Golden 1 Credit Union by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ernce, Lynn) |
| NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED Application for Writ of Garnishment. (Becknal, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Clemans | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael Carey Clemans | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Lynn Trinka Ernce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
