United States of America v. Approximately $8,000.00 in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
Approximately $8,000.00 in U.S. Currency |
Chaz Butler |
2:2019mc00104 |
June 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
William B Shubb |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/25/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Consent Judgment served on Chaz Butler. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 3 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Consent Judgment of Forfeiture by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Khasigian, Kevin) Modified on 7/25/2019 (Huang, H). |
Filing 2 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/28/2019 EXTENDING Time to 8/5/2019, for the United States to file a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture. (York, M) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Stipulation and Order served on Chaz Butler. (York, M) |
Filing 1 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Filing a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture by United States of America. Attorney Khasigian, Kevin Christopher added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Khasigian, Kevin) |
NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED - Stipulation re Forfeiture. (Becknal, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.