(SS) Byers v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Alaina Marie Byers
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2020cv00001
Filed: December 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2020 Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/23/2020. (Tupolo, A)
January 28, 2020 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Jenkins, Chantal)
January 22, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Fraulob, Joseph)
January 22, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Alaina Marie Byers pursuant to order of the court. (Fraulob, Joseph)
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 4/16/2020 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Benson, A.)
January 13, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Joseph Clayton Fraulob* *Law Offices of Hadley & Fraulob* *230 Fifth Street* *Marysville, CA 95901*. (Benson, A.)
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 01/13/20 GRANTING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP; Clerk to serve scheduling order; within 15 days, plaintiff shall submit service documents to the USM and file a statement to the court regarding the submission; USM shall serve process within 60 days. (Benson, A.)
January 2, 2020 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Kaminski, H)
December 31, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Alaina Marie Byers. (Fraulob, Joseph)
December 31, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Alaina Marie Byers (Fraulob, Joseph)
December 31, 2019 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Alaina Marie Byers.(Fraulob, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Byers v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alaina Marie Byers
Represented By: Joseph Clayton Fraulob
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Chantal Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?