Woodside Investments, Inc. et al v. Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. et al
| Susan Wood, Dennis Wood, Woodside Investments, Inc. and S and W Steel Fabricators, Inc. |
| Joseph LaForte, Joe Mack, Fast Advance Funding, Inc., Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. and Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. Doing business as Par Funding |
| 2:2020cv00042 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| John A Mendez |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of FILING BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record by S and W Steel Fabricators, Inc., Dennis Wood, Susan Wood, Woodside Investments, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Madaen, Bahram) |
Filing 24
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/20/2020 DENYING #4 Plaintiffs' Motion for preliminary injunction. (Reader, L)
|
| Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER: The hearing on the motion(s) now calendared for February 25, 2020 is/are ordered submitted without appearance and without argument pursuant to Local Rule 230 (g). If the Court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
| Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER: The minute order 21 entered on 2/12/2020 is vacated. The motion to transfer venue #14 remains set on March 24, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
| Filing 21 MINUTE ORDER: On January 16, 2020, the Court ordered Defendants to file an opposition to Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 6. In response, Defendants filed both an opposition, ECF No. 19, and a motion to transfer venue, ECF No. 12. Defendants did not properly notice their motion for a hearing as required by Local Rule 230(b). The Court DISMISSES Defendants motion to transfer without prejudice for failure to comply with this requirement. IT IS SO ORDERED. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
| Filing 20 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., Fast Advance Funding, Inc., Joseph LaForte in re #19 Opposition to Motion. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Berman, Brett) Modified on 2/7/2020 (Kastilahn, A). |
| Filing 19 OPPOSITION by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., Fast Advance Funding, Inc., Joseph LaForte to #4 Motion for TRO. Attorney Berman, Brett added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Berman, Brett) Modified on 2/7/2020 (Kastilahn, A). |
| Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: The parties have stipulated to extending Defendants time to file an opposition brief to Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. ECF No. 17. Defendants opposition brief is now due February 4, 2020. Consequently, Plaintiffs reply brief is due February 11, 2020 and the hearing on the motion is CONTINUED to February 25, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for EXTENSION of TIME by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., Fast Advance Funding, Inc., Joseph LaForte. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Chang, Jaemin) Modified on 1/27/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 16 PROPOSED ORDER re Motion to Transfer Venue by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., Fast Advance Funding, Inc., Joseph LaForte. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Chang, Jaemin) Modified on 1/27/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 15 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., Fast Advance Funding, Inc., Joseph LaForte. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Chang, Jaemin) Modified on 1/27/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF LODGING DOCUMENT(S) ELECTRONICALLY by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., Fast Advance Funding, Inc., Joseph LaForte: Notice of Motion and Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1404. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Chang, Jaemin) Modified on 1/27/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Brett Berman in support of #4 Motion for TRO. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Chang, Jaemin) Modified on 1/27/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., Fast Advance Funding, Inc., Joseph LaForte in SUPPORT of #4 Motion for TRO. Attorney Chang, Jaemin added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Chang, Jaemin) Modified on 1/27/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/22/2020 SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY Jaemin Chang for Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. in place of attorney Matthew Edward Podmenik. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/22/2020 SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY Brett Berman, PHV for Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. in place of attorney Matthew Edward Podmenik. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 9
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/23/2020. Added attorney Brett Berman, PHV for Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. (Coll, A)
|
| Filing 8 SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc.. (Chang, Jaemin) |
| Filing 7 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. for attorney Brett Berman to appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Chang, Jaemin added. (Chang, Jaemin) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy G. Michel for District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/16/2020: On January 15, 2020, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order and for an order to show good cause regarding why the Court should not issue a preliminary injunction. See ECF Nos. #3 , #4 . The Court read and considered Plaintiffs' application. Plaintiffs failed to adequately prove they face an immediate risk of irreparable harm. Their Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is therefore DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is SET for hearing on February 11, 2020 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 6 before District Judge John A. Mendez. Defendants' opposition brief is due by January 28, 2020. Plaintiffs' reply is due by February 4, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. re #2 Civil New Case Documents for JAM. (Podmenik, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER amending #3 Motion for TRO by S and W Steel Fabricators, Inc., Dennis Wood, Susan Wood, Woodside Investments, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proof of Service, #5 TRO Checklist, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit E, #11 Exhibit F, #12 Exhibit G, #13 Exhibit H, #14 Exhibit I, #15 Exhibit J, #16 Exhibit K, #17 Exhibit L, #18 Exhibit M, #19 Exhibit N, #20 Exhibit O, #21 Exhibit P)(Madaen, Bahram) Modified on 1/17/2020 (Zignago, K.). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by S and W Steel Fabricators, Inc., Dennis Wood, Susan Wood, Woodside Investments, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Proof of Service, #4 Proposed Order, #5 Declaration TRO Checklist)(Madaen, Bahram) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Huang, H) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Yolo County Superior Court, case number CV-19-2631 by Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8652675) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proof of Service)(Podmenik, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
