(PC) Cortes-Salcedo v. City of Redding et al
| Martin J. Cortes-Salcedo |
| Redding Police Department, City of Redding, Redding Police Officer and Richard |
| 2:2020cv00048 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
REQUEST for SUBPOENA by Martin J. Cortes-Salcedo. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Martin J. Cortes-Salcedo. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/8/2020 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, an affidavit to proceed ifp or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and ifp application served on Martin J. Cortes-Salcedo. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 2/10/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Tupolo, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Martin J. Cortes-Salcedo. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Martin J. Cortes-Salcedo.(Tupolo, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
