(SS)(PS) Slattery v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kevin Slattery
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2020cv00058
Filed: January 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Kevin Slattery. Commissioner of Social Security served on 2/21/2020, answer due 4/21/2020. (Kastilahn, A)
February 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Jeong, In Seon)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL: Consent or Decline due by 5/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (York, M)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Kevin Slattery* *1421 W Street, #9* *Sacramento, CA 95818*. (York, M)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/13/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The clerk is DIRECTED to issue process. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM the necessary documents. Within 5 days after submitting the necessary documents to the United States Marshal (USM) for service or process, plaintiff shall file in this court a declaration stating the date on which the documents were submitted to the USM. Failure to file a timely declaration may result in an order imposing appropriate sanctions. The USM is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs within 60 days. (York, M)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Summons, #5 Social Security New Case Documents along with 1 USM-285 form and a courtesy copy of #1 Complaint served on Kevin Slattery. (York, M)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Kevin Slattery. (Coll, A)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Kevin Slattery.(Coll, A)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Coll, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS)(PS) Slattery v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Slattery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: In Seon Jeong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?