(PC) Smith v. Singh et al
| Donald Joshua Smith |
| Omoniyi Akintola, Dharmyir Singh and L. Eldridge |
| 2:2020cv00101 |
| January 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (York, M)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Donald Joshua Smith. (York, M)
|
|
Filing 8
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Donald Joshua Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (York, M)
|
|
Filing 7
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The new case number is: 2:20-cv-0101-TLN-EFB (PC). (Huang, H)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Donald Joshua Smith. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/22/2020 DISREGARDING plaintiff's #1 unsigned complaint and #2 ifp application. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit a signed complaint and ifp application. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal. The Clerk shall send to plaintiff a new ifp application form and a copy of his unsigned complaint. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order along with copy of #1 unsigned complaint and new ifp application form served on Donald Joshua Smith. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 4
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Donald Joshua Smith. (Huang, H)
|
|
CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Donald Joshua Smith, CDC D-41316 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *1/14/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 2/21/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Tupolo, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Donald Joshua Smith. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Donald Joshua Smith. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Donald Joshua Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tupolo, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
